The 3 study groups for this analysis in-cluded the following: (1) women who would be diagnosed with GDM only by Carpenter-Coustan criteria (CC only); (2) women diagnosed and treated for GDM by NDDG criteria (NDDG), re-gardless of subsequent treatment (diet control vs medical management with in-sulin or glyburide) required; and (3) women who ...

The National Diabetes Data Group (NDDG) criteria stipulate using fasting, 1-hour, 2-hour, and 3-hour plasma glucose levels of 105mg/dL, 190mg/dL, 165mg/dL, and 145mg/dL, respectively, for GDM diagnosis. 7 Carpenter-Coustan (CC) criteria are more inclusive with lower threshold values of 95mg/dL, 180mg/dL, 155mg/dL, and 140mg/dL. 8 By both ...

Feb 21, 2011 · We compared women who would have been diagnosed with GDM only by the more inclusive Carpenter-Coustan criteria (CC only) with each of the other 2 study groups: women diagnosed with and treated for GDM by NDDG criteria (NDDG); and women who screened positive but had a negative OGTT by both diagnostic criteria (negative OGTT).

Use of Carpenter-Coustan compared to National Diabetes Data Group (NDDG) criteria increases the number of women diagnosed with GDM by 30-50%, but whether treatment of this milder GDM reduces adverse outcomes is unknown.

Use of Carpenter-Coustan (CC) compared to National Diabetes Data Group (NDDG) criteria increases the number of women diagnosed with GDM by 30-50%, but whether treatment of this milder GDM reduces adverse outcomes is unknown.

May 24, 2018 · Objective: To compare healthcare utilization and outcomes using the Carpenter-Coustan (CC) criteria vs. the National Diabetes Data Group (NDDG) criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. Prior to 8/21/2013, patients were classified as "GDM by CC" if they met criteria.

Objective: To examine perinatal outcomes in women who would meet the diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) according to the Carpenter and Coustan but not by the National Diabetes Data Group (NDDG) thresholds.

Sep 1, 2002 · Overall, the GDM prevalence among screened women was 3.2% (95% CI 3.0–3.4) by NDDG and 4.8% (95% CI 4.5–5.1) by Carpenter and Coustan criteria, and based on either threshold, it increased with age (P < 0.001).

Sep 1, 2011 · We compared women who would have been diagnosed with GDM only by the more inclusive Carpenter-Coustan criteria (CC only) with each of the other 2 study groups: women diagnosed with and treated for GDM by NDDG criteria (NDDG); and women who screened positive but had a negative OGTT by both diagnostic criteria (negative OGTT).

To compare healthcare utilization and outcomes using the Carpenter-Coustan (CC) criteria vs. the National Diabetes Data Group (NDDG) criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).