The Supreme Court Ducked Another Big Abortion Case. Clarence Thomas Is Livid.
For nearly three years, it has seemed inevitable that the Supreme Court would strike down the “buffer zones” that restrict protests near the entrances of reproductive health clinics. A majority of the court has already castigated these laws—and past precedent upholding them—as a subversion of anti-abortion protesters’ First Amendment rights.
The Supreme Court's most conservative justice has called for the court to revisit the decision establishing the right to same-sex marriage.
The Supreme Court on Monday turned down a case challenging a “buffer zone” law, restricting speech within 100 feet of abortion clinics, but a potent dissent by Justice Clarence Thomas warrants ...
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas stands onstage after addressing the Federalist Society’s National Lawyers Convention dinner at National Harbor, in Oxon Hill, Maryland, on Thursday ...
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or ...
Democrats have long opposed honoring Thomas, a Georgia native who was accused of sexual harassment during his 1991 confirmation hearing.
Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito said they would have granted the requests to hear the cases. In a dissent from the Supreme Court's denial of the appeal in one of those disputes ...
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results
Feedback