Airlines have some pretty strict dress codes, but they can also be vague and unclear. Spirit Airlines recently tightened its ...

Spirit Airlines has updated its dress requirements effective January 22, mandating that passengers must not be barefoot or inadequately clothed, which includes see-through clothing or exposed ...

Spirit Airlines updated its dress code this week with more descriptive and restrictive rules, warning passengers that showing too much skin — or a crass tattoo — could get them banned from ...

Spirit Airlines has come up with its own twist on that slogan in its updated in-flight dress code. Showing off your nasty tats, lewd or obscene clothes? No ticket! Spirit Airlines has introduced a new ...

Spirit Airlines updated its dress code this ... risk of offense or annoyance to other passengers.” Another clash over clothing occurred later that year. In San Francisco, a Delta flight crew ...

Spirit Airlines said its passengers may not be allowed to board the aircraft or can be forced to leave if they are sporting “lewd” clothing and/or have not covered “offensive” tattoos, according to ...

Spirit Airlines customers could be removed from ... The low-cost U.S. carrier explicitly banned see-through clothing, bare feet and exposed private parts, as well as clothing or body art that ...

While packing is usually the main clothing concern for airborne-bound travelers, Spirit Airlines wants them to think twice about how they dress. The low-budget carrier updated its “Code of ...

You may need to cover up on your next the Spirit Airlines flight out of Detroit if you're wearing clothing or have tattoos airline staff aren't comfortable with. The budget airline updated its ...

Passengers flying with Spirit Airlines may need to adjust their ... are “barefoot or inadequately clothed (e.g., see-through clothing; not adequately covered; exposed breasts, buttocks, or ...

Spirit Airlines said its passengers may not be allowed to board the aircraft or can be forced to leave if they are sporting “lewd” clothing and/or have not covered “offensive” tattoos ...