The US Supreme Court has begun hearing a case that could have wide-reaching implications for the internet. Chatbot wars: Google launches Bard to take on ChatGPT ‘It is the internet’: Rohingya ...
In late December 2020, President Trump vetoed the $741 billion annual U.S. defense spending bill because, in part, it did not repeal or modify Section 230 to no longer shield Internet companies.
Hosted on MSN4mon
The Supreme Court may have a shot to strike down Section 230 after a child's death was blamed on a 'blackout challenge' seen on TikTokSection 230 defenders argue the ruling is a blow to ... "That would still be terrible for business on the internet, but it wouldn't kill all websites," Rosenblatt said of upholding a more narrow ...
The bottom line is that both Democrats and Republicans would like to weaken or abolish Section 230, and that doing so would ...
But what is particularly bizarre, ironic, and deeply destructive to public discourse is that, though Congress passed Section 230 to promote a free and open internet, Facebook, Twitter, and Google ...
President Donald J. Trump signed an executive order (EO) titled “Restoring Freedom of Speech and Ending Federal Censorship,” ...
In Ryan v. X Corp., a Northern District of California court held that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act immunized ...
You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.
“That universal understanding of Section 230 has been pivotal to the development of the modern internet,” TikTok writes. Some industry observers and legal experts said the 3rd Circuit's ruling ...
Anyone following the debate over section 230 immunity for social-media platforms should be interested in the Third Circuit’s ruling on Tuesday in Anderson v. TikTok, Inc.—both the majority ...
The CEOs of Twitter, Facebook and Alphabet defended Section 230, which gives online companies immunity from legal liability for user-generated content and latitude to control what appears on their ...
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 has been called the “Internet’s First Amendment.” It’s also been called a tool for Big Tech to avoid accountability. Now, the U.S ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback