Repealing Section 230 would not curb Big Tech dominance or protect free speech — it would silence smaller platforms, crush ...

A public-school teacher wears a MAGA hat at a training session on cultural sensitivity (Dodge v. Evergreen School District ...

For years, Section 230 has allowed tech giants to host content without facing liability. Now, that legal shield is under fire. As lawmakers debate its future, we examine what it means for free speech, ...

X Corp. argues in its lawsuit that Minnesota's deepfake law violates its free speech rights under the First Amendment.

Pushing to dismiss a lawsuit alleging that its chatbots caused a teen's suicide, Character Technologies is arguing that ...

In a suit filed Wednesday, X argues the law violates its free speech rights and "will lead to blanket censorship, including of fully protected, core political speech." The company is asking a ...

January 31, 2023, Opinion: "On February 21 and 22, 2023, the United States Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments in cases involving the content moderation practices of social media platforms.

Owens called Trump “messy” for disguising his moves as correlating to DEI and highlighted how it will have lingering effects long after he leaves the White House. In a shocking turn of events ...

"This system will inevitably result in the censorship of wide swaths of valuable political speech and commentary," X said in its ... judge to find the law is precluded by what is known as Section 230, ...

X, owned by Elon Musk, has sued Minnesota over its law banning AI-generated deepfakes intended to influence elections, ...

It does not necessarily reflect the view of The Herald. The laws of free speech are immutable. They never change. They must not change. The founding principle is the hard, important ask ...

"This system will inevitably result in the censorship of wide swaths of valuable political speech and commentary ... precluded by what is known as Section 230, a federal law that protects ...