Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas slammed a circuit court of appeals for not adhering to legal precedent in a dissent released on Monday. Thomas dissented from a denial by the court to review a lower court's decision. Justice Samuel Alito joined the opinion.
Voting rights experts say Mississippi’s restrictions are among the harshest because the state bans voting by first-time offenders who commit non-violent felonies.
The conservative Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that the federal law banning handgun sales to teens is inconsistent with the nation's historical tradition and violates the Second Amendment.
Trump's press secretary called the administration's view that "someone who breaks our immigration laws is a criminal" a "big culture shift."
Former Spanish soccer chief Luis Rubiales goes on trial from Monday at Madrid's High Court for his kiss on the lips of World Cup winner Jenni Hermoso that was watched by millions and triggered a backlash against machismo in the sport.
Can the federal government eliminate “diversity, equity, and inclusion” and “gender ideology” without violating civil rights?
No longer just campaign trail rhetoric, President Donald Trump’s insistence that immigration to the United States amounts to an “invasion” may be critical to unlocking extraordinary powers as the administration carries out his deportation agenda.
There’s a feeling of gloom in many a house in Northeast Ohio and across our nation. But there is hope, too. There’s hope because Kamala Harris came close, just 1.5 percent shy. There’s hope in the millions of people and the organizations that will fight.
The Lodha brothers told the Bombay High Court that they were agreeable to going into mediation over a dispute about the use of their trademark. A mediator, Retired Supreme Court judge Justice RV Raveendran,
The Supreme Court has upheld a 2023 ruling by the Bombay High Court (HC), which directed the Nagpur collector to assess the extent of the damage suffered by Dalit researchers Kshipra Uke and Shiv Shankar Das due to the loss of their research data,
A judge has ruled that private interests and climate change considerations should have been considered when the U.K. government approved the Rosebank oilfield.