In the first AI copyright case ruling, a court concludes that training an AI system using copyrighted material isn't fair use. That will likely be cited by creators fighting other tech giants.

A daily download of the topics driving the tech policy agenda, from Brussels to London to Silicon Valley. By TOM BRISTOW with ...

Artificial intelligence developers have long argued that the act of scraping the internet for data to train their models is fair use. However, artists, authors and creators of all disciplines have ...

Brian Wahl is the principal at Phoebe Hearst Elementary. It’s a school with specific a demand for bilingual teachers. About 65 percent of the school’s students are Hispanic, and English is not their ...

The copyright lawsuit was filed after Ross Intelligence used Thomson Reuters’ Westlaw database to train its AI-powered legal ...

A judge looked at possible copyright infringement defenses for Ross Intelligence and said, ‘I reject them all.’ ...

Vance, speaking at the Artificial Intelligence Action Summit in Paris on Tuesday, hewed closely to President Donald Trump's ...

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has soundly dismissed a $97.4 billion takeover bid backed by rival Elon Musk, but the unsolicited offer is likely to add complications to Altman’s push to transform the maker of ...

PEORIA, Ill. (WMBD) –Artificial intelligence technology has advanced into almost all aspects of our lives, and the medical field is no exception. From lifting the workload from doctors to helping ...

An AI company lifted material from Thomson Reuters' research platform, arguing fair use and innocent infringement. A court has ruled it was copyright violation.

The Thomson Reuters decision has big implications for the battle between generative AI companies and rightsholders.

A federal judge in Delaware on Tuesday said that a former competitor of Thomson Reuters was not permitted by U.S. copyright ...