Let us name the operator [DEFINITE]. It has two features: [+Def] and [-Def]. [DEF] and its argument form an object. The NP the dog would have the following logical structure: The features [+Def, -Dem] ...

I hope a reader can show me where I've gone astray in the sequence steps that constitute this argument against abortion ... life case by a sort of Socratic logic. My conclusion is that Roe ...

To understand the meaning of WH-operators, perhaps a look at the semantics or logic of WH-operators might be helpful ... Both examples have similar argument structures, except for one feature: (13) WH ...

Life is full of logical arguments. Logical arguments are simple chains of statements people make to explain something they believe or notice about themselves, other people or the world at large.

First of all, identify the overall logical structure of the sentence ... Exercise 2.6.3 Display the propositional structure of the following argument. Premise 1: The greatest genius of our time must ...

When considering your argument or the arguments of others, writers and readers need to be aware of logical fallacies. Logical fallacies are found in many places—ads, politics, movies. Logical ...

One of the most fundamental skills LSAT takers need to master is how to divide an argument into premises and conclusions. A logical argument is a series of claims that make a point. A conclusion ...

We use the word “fallacious” to describe an argument that is not logical. A basic argument will have these things: 1) one or more premises, and 2) one conclusion. The first parts of the ...

Most importantly, logical reasoning prompts tend to ... It is a test of understanding the structure of a written argument and knowing how to locate critical information in a thicket of complex ...