Nathan Mammen and Cole Tipton of Snell & Wilmer LLP address the question as to how AI could affect or even upend determining ...
A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday affirmed that a work of art generated by artificial intelligence ...
US patent law says inventors must be human, but they can use AI. This changes the nature of invention and raises the question ...
A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday affirmed that a work of art generated by artificial intelligence ...
Artificial intelligence (AI) has disrupted sectors, but where it merges with intellectual property (IP) law is a novel ...
(The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.) W. Keith Robinson, Wake Forest University (THE CONVERSATION) The advent of ...
WASHINGTON – A federal appeals court in Washington, DC, on March 18 affirmed that a work of art generated by artificial intelligence (AI) without human input cannot be copyrighted under US law.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback