"MeitY has not sent any notice to Grok or X. It is in talks with X and ... the government's interpretation of the Information Technology (IT) Act, specifically Section 79(3)(b), which according to X, ...

In its petition, X challenged the Centre’s use of Section 79(3)(b) of the Information Technology (IT) Act to block content X has also sought protection from the court for not onboarding an ...

The Centre defended takedown notices under Section 79(3)(b) of the IT Act against X’s challenge, asserting that this mechanism supports rather than undermines the Section 69A blocking process.

The Centre rebuffed X's challenge on Section 79(3)(b) notices, asserting it's essential for due diligence and distinct from Section 69A's blocking process.

complained that the government misused Section 79(3)(b) of the IT Act, 2000, to order the removal of content. The company has argued that the Centre’s “misuse” of the provision bypassed ...

Discover why X (formerly Twitter) is fighting India's takedown notices in court, citing misuse of Section 79(3)(b) of the IT ...

No notice to X on Grok AI responses, govt official says; informal discussions under way X argues — as have civil society groups — that this is an overreach. “Section 79(3)(b) of the IT Act ...

Social media platform X has approached the Karnataka High Court against the Centre’s powers to revoke safe harbour provisions under Section 79(3)(b) of the Information Technology Act ...

X, formerly Twitter, has filed a petition in the Karnataka high court challenging the Indian government’s use of Section 79(3)(b) of the Information Technology Act, arguing that it not only sets ...

Lawsuit alleges government using Section 79(3)(b) to create parallel content-blocking mechanism, bypassing structured legal process outlined in Section 69A The Tribune, now published from ...

Elon Musk's X filed a lawsuit against the Indian government for allegedly misusing the IT Act to block content on the platform. The case challenges the interpretation of Section 79(3)(b), claiming ...

The Centre rebuffed X's challenge on Section 79(3)(b) notices, asserting it's essential for due diligence and distinct from Section 69A's blocking process. Rebuffing X’s challenge against ...