On Tuesday, the Supreme Court will hear a pair of cases, back-to-back, on cell phone privacy. At 10 a.m., the court takes up Riley v. California. And at 11 a.m., the court hears United States v.

Moreover, “[m]odern cell phones, as a category,” Roberts noted, “implicate privacy concerns far beyond those implicated by the search of a cigarette pack, a wallet, or a purse.” Responding to the ...

Class actions rarely go to trial, which is why a case against Google is proving to be an outlier. The tech giant is defending ...

Editor’s Note: Catherine Crump is a staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union’s Speech, Privacy and Technology Project. Do you know how long your ...

The storage capacity of cell phones has several interrelated consequences for privacy. First, a cell phone collects in one place many distinct types of information—an address, a note, a ...

Arizona recently recognized a “legitimate expectation of privacy” in cell phones. The case was State v. Peoples, and the opinion was issued on September 12, 2016. The Peoples case was about ...

Of all of the recent technological developments that have expanded the surveillance capabilities of law enforcement agencies at the expense of individual privacy, perhaps the most powerful is cell ...

Cell Phones NPR's Nina Totenberg reports on today's Supreme Court arguments in a cell phone privacy case. The case tests whether someone can sue if his cell phone call is eavesdropped on, and the ...

Cell phones — particularly smartphones — are inherently bad for privacy. You’ve basically got a tracking device in your pocket, pinging off cell towers and locking onto GPS satellites.

Let us help you. Published September 29, 2022 Thorin Klosowski Share this post In the 15 years since the iPhone’s debut, the world of data privacy has changed significantly. Since 2007 ...