On Tuesday, the Supreme Court will hear a pair of cases, back-to-back, on cell phone privacy. At 10 a.m., the court takes up Riley v. California. And at 11 a.m., the court hears United States v.

The storage capacity of cell phones has several interrelated consequences for privacy. First, a cell phone collects in one place many distinct types of information—an address, a note, a ...

Editor’s Note: Catherine Crump is a staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union’s Speech, Privacy and Technology Project. Do you know how long your ...

Moreover, “[m]odern cell phones, as a category,” Roberts noted, “implicate privacy concerns far beyond those implicated by the search of a cigarette pack, a wallet, or a purse.” Responding to the ...

Let us help you. Published September 29, 2022 Thorin Klosowski Share this post In the 15 years since the iPhone’s debut, the world of data privacy has changed significantly. Since 2007 ...

Arizona recently recognized a “legitimate expectation of privacy” in cell phones. The case was State v. Peoples, and the opinion was issued on September 12, 2016. The Peoples case was about ...

Cell phones — particularly smartphones — are inherently bad for privacy. You’ve basically got a tracking device in your pocket, pinging off cell towers and locking onto GPS satellites.

Cell Phones NPR's Nina Totenberg reports on today's Supreme Court arguments in a cell phone privacy case. The case tests whether someone can sue if his cell phone call is eavesdropped on, and the ...

the particularity requirement is the last line of defense for a suspect's cell phone privacy against government intrusion. The courts' heightened sensitivity to this requirement is the subject of ...